Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 9159

Re: SHADOW_IMPORT_INC  issue during EHP 7 upgrade

$
0
0

Hi,

 

My issue was due to DB mirroring setup. In our DB mirror setup, whenever a commit happens the data will firstly be written at the DR site then writes at the Primary Database instance. (This method of setup was to avoid data loss during a System/DBcrash). the same principles works when the SUM tool runs in to "pre-Processing". The data will be writen in the DR site first before the Primary DB instance (note: we switch the DB mode to simple only at the 'Execution' stage). This was the reason why it took so long time for each package to import during shadow phase. So we had to break the mirror setup before the Pre-processsing. Then we could see an improvement in the performance

 

If you have completed the Upgrade in QTY, you can compare the duration of each package import between QTY and PRD. That will help you understand how much more time PRD takes during the Pre-processing. There was a huge difference in our case between these systems and the only difference we had between QTY and PRD was DB mirror setup

 

EX log:

4 ETW000 SAPKW74003 touched.

4 ETW690 COMMIT "128" "769438150"

4 ETW000

24536164 bytes read.

4 ETW000 Transport overhead 0.0 %.

4 ETW000 Duration: 3:02 min (134814 bytes/sec).

3 ETW710 "1" "0"

 

THe below notes may be helpful to you

 

note #965908

 

1616401 - Understanding parallelism during the Upgrades, EhPs and

Support Packages implementations

 

1945399 - performance analysis for SHADOW_IMPORT_INC

and TABIM_UPG phase

 

Thanks,

ASK


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 9159

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>