Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 9159

Are there any (dis)advantages in building a universe on fully normalized tables instead of building dimensional model/tables and then universe on top of them?

$
0
0

Hello,

I’m hoping someone can help me with understanding advantages and disadvantages if we want to build a universe on top of a fully normalized tables, compared to using a dimensional model with star schemas.

 

I’ve read some discussions here that say that it is possible to create a universe on top of normalized tables. Then, can we avoid building of dimensional tables (a data mart), and just use normalized tables? I would say that it is easier to use star schema dimensions and facts tables to build a universe, but our end users might ask “why do we have to go through building a dimensional data mart, if we can have same reports with hierarchies and drill-down functionality based on a universe built on top of our already existing normalized tables?”

 

Can you point me to some established best practices regarding using normalized tables to build a universe? Any documents with some examples for this?

Any expected difficulties during design/development phase of our universe, related to using normalized tables?

Any expected performance degradation if we use normalized tables compared to using dimensional tables?

Can I build universe more easily if I transform (modify) our normalized model (by using alias tables and views) to look like snowflake model?

 

I’m using BOE XI 3.1, tables are in Oracle 11.2.

 

Thank you


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 9159

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>